The Electronic Edition of
OLD HAMS NEWS
The Journal of the
OLDHAM AMATEUR RADIO CLUB
April 2005
RALLY 2005
The Oldham Radio Club Rally was held at the Oldham Sports Centre, Lord St. Oldham on Sunday 23rd January 2005.
It was touch and go as to whether the rally would ever go ahead due to the very late booking of the majority of the traders. The major players had booked in early as anticipated but the remainder did not show any interest until after the New Year was well aired. This gave rally organiser Steve Crane G0KUY plenty of work and headaches in trying to persuade traders to commit themselves to coming or not. In the end though his hard work was rewarded by having an almost fully booked event with 37 exhibitors committed to come.
The hall
layout was conceived and completed by Club Treasurer Geoff Ashton M0AUG and
Club Secretary Mike Crossley M1CVL who pieced the bits together through the
weekend preceding the rally. Mike was then able to produce and print out the
rally programmes. He also produced the Club Members Identification Badges.
On the Saturday afternoon of the rally weekend 6 members met at the hall to set out the table layout. Sadly one of these, Bertie Whitcher G7JUL was given a parking ticket for under payment for the length of his stay for this afternoon session.
Before the Sunday dawned members gathered at the hall to meet the first trader. As usual this was Waters and Stanton who actually arrived slightly before many members but their vehicle was swiftly unloaded and their goods moved to their tables. Incidentally Mark Francis from W&S especially asked that club members receive his thanks for the help and assistance given to him on the day. Slowly but surely all the other traders and exhibitors arrived and were unloaded. In fact this process went so smoothly that we were able to open the rally early at 10:15 as a queue had already formed at the entrance.
Talk-in was hosted by Geoff Oliver G0BJR and Keith Feay G1GZK from our club shack and throughout the day helped around 40 people to find the venue.
For the
first time this year we were honoured to have the President of the RSGB Jeff
Smith MI0AEX as our guest. He spent the whole day meeting people and having a
good natter. He even helped out with clearing away at the end of the event.
Our Chairman gave him an official welcome after he had shut down the talk-in
station. (see photograph which was taken by Jeff Hollowood G7LMI). We received
word later that he had really enjoyed the day.
Once again, and as we have come to expect over the years, members pulled out all the stops to help out at both ends of the day. Goods were moved from vehicles to tables and back again with speed, efficiency and good humour. Members efforts were also required through the day for door takings, and many other organisational tasks. All vital in their own way in contributing towards the overall success of the event, not only for our club but for the traders, our visitors and guests.
Our friends from RADARS, the Rochdale and District Amateur Radio Society, organised and ran the Bring and Buy for which they receive our thanks and hopes that they had a good day.
The club’s web site at www.oarc.org.uk scored many hits in the weeks preceding the event. During the last 2 weeks some 300 hits were counted but another 400 were counted in the final 24 hours before the event. It is now quite obvious that this plays a significant role in attracting visitors to our event and the efforts of Geoff Ashton M0AUG and Mike Crossley M1CVL to produce rally documentation for posting on the site are well worth it.
Finally thanks go to all members who helped out to make the event possible. It was by no means certain that the event would take place as traders were so slow to respond to our invitations that there was a strong possibility that it would have to be cancelled. In the end it all happened and this is mainly due to the dogged determination and persistence of Steve Crane G0KUY. Well Done Steve and many thanks. You can rest now until September when it all starts again.
Photographs of the event were taken and provided by Jeff
Hollowood G7LMI, Jack Elliot G3KIQ, Craig Taylor G7MCT
and Becci Davenport 2E1INC.
NEW LOOK OLD HAMS NEWS
Old Hams News has taken on a slightly new look. Because of the new method of distribution I can be much more adventurous, imaginative and flexible in the production of our tome.
Apart from making a considerable financial saving for the club the technical quality of the document can be enormously improved. More photographs can be imported and they can be displayed in colour and higher resolution. The weak link in the chain of production previously was always the final photocopy run. A superb example of this is the photograph of the overview of the Sports Hall in the Rally Report. It would have been impossible to use this great picture in the photocopied version because in the final print it would have been reduced to an indistinct muddy mess.
The front page has also been reconstructed. This has been done mainly so that the whole document can be compressed into one file instead of two. Previously the front page was created using a desk top publishing program which produced a large file size. Now the page is created in the word processing program as an integral part of the overall document. Thus making just one file instead of two and reducing the file size at the same time.
You also have the choice to either print out your own copy of the document or to read it directly off your monitor screen. Coming as it does as a pdf file it is easier to store than a paper copy and if you are concerned about environmental issues this is a much friendlier way to keep your copies.
It is possible that some of you may dislike this method of distribution, and if you do then I commiserate with you but this is the way your committee has decided to go in making financial savings for the club. Declining income from the rally and maybe its complete demise in the future would make it impossible to produce Old Hams News using the previous method.
If you have any "constructive" comments or suggestions on layout or content of our journal then please contact me and I will be delighted to consider them.
Geoff Oliver G0BJR
Chairman and Editor
DAB vs WS vs FM
An interesting heading? We’ll see – read on.
Just over 2 years ago I purchased a WorldSpace Receiver and composed a report on it in the January 2003 edition of OHN. Later another report appeared on the topic of Digital Audio Broadcasting. This dealt more with the technical quality of the DAB transmissions rather than the choice of stations. Now this following report is an update of sorts and a comparison, both of technical quality and of programme choice.
WorldSpace has proved to be a waste of space as feared in my earlier column. However because of the choice of receiver purchased it is not a complete loss because the radio is also an excellent VHF/MW/SW receiver and is in daily use on these bands. WorldSpace is currently transmitting 35 radio stations from the Afristar Satellite. Not bad you might think. But of those 35 stations only 8 are transmitted "in the clear", all the rest are encoded and a subscription of $10/month is required to open the others up. Sadly amongst those now requiring a subscription are, Maestro - a very listenable Classical Music Station, The Hop – also very listenable 50’s, 60’s and 70’s music station, and Riff – a modern jazz music station, and these were the stations I listened to on a regular basis.
The subscription issue is hardly surprising as I never heard any advertising on any of these channels and I suppose the service has to be funded somehow. However a subscription based radio service will always be a non starter in this country as we have been spoilt by superb radio output from both the BBC and Independent sources at no charge. Also the transmissions emanate from a satellite primarily aimed at the African Continent. This is an ideal method of bringing radio to a massive area and to a potential massive audience. But the majority of that audience probably does not have enough money to purchase the batteries for a WorldSpace receiver, so it is most unlikely that they will pay a monthly subscription. This makes the decision to impose a subscription charge for this region somewhat mysterious to me.
So having largely dumped WorldSpace I reverted back to the previously mentioned superb and free transmissions from the BBC et al. But as the VHF tuner in my Hi Fi system was growing rather long in the tooth and showing signs of its age – some 25 years plus, I decided it was time to replace it. And now that Digital Audio Broadcasting is becoming more popular and there is now a good choice of portable and fixed models available at affordable prices I opted for a DAB/FM/AM tuner to see how that went.
After connecting the beast into the Hi Fi system and sticking the supplied wire dipole antenna to the wall with Blue Tack (much to my XYL’s annoyance) I switched on and pressed the autotune button. It scanned around for a while with various letters and numbers flitting across the display panel which eventually stopped and boldly stated "No Stations Found". After repositioning my jaw and the antenna I manfully poked the autotune button once again. This time after the same whirling of letters and numbers the display informed me that it had found one station – BBC Radio 1, a station I will never knowingly select. Time for a rethink, I think.
While the rethink was going on I selected the FM band and did an autotune and low and behold a plethora of stations were being listed on the scrolling display. Mind you I have a dedicated FM radio antenna mounted on the chimney so this was not surprising. It was pleasing to see that the RDS function was working so beautifully that it even gave scrolling programme information in addition to the station identification. Something I did not realise was even transmitted in this band. BBC GMR is particularly good in this respect.
Flushed with success I quickly tried the AM facility, which again worked perfectly even though the antenna was pretty makeshift.
So back to the DAB band. I moved the antenna as high up the wall as it would go and this time did a forced autotune. The results were startlingly better. This time the display informed me that it had found 17 stations so I started going through them. Some were quite good quality but the reception quality of many others was so bad that it just sounded like severe flatulence in the bath. It was quite obvious that my antenna was totally inadequate and I would have to do something else.
One of the contributing problems with DAB reception in our geographical location is the power of the transmissions. There are 2 frequency bands allocated, Band III, which is approx 220–230MHz, and ‘L’ band which is approx 1.4GHz. There are 2 transmitter sites. The main, or National Multiplex is at Winter Hill emitting at 10 Watts, - that is not a misprint, TEN watts. The other is known as a local multiplex located on the Sunley building at Piccadilly Plaza in city centre Manchester, which emits its RF at 0.5 Watts, yes half a Watt. No wonder I was struggling. The normal FM transmitter at Holme Moss whacks out 500KW – a massive difference.
The following weekend I was able to produce a makeshift antenna and mount it in the loft. I then forced the autotune once again. Instead of the usual skittering of data on the display, this time was a solid message with a progress indicator and a count of stations detected. On completion it proudly stated that it had now stored 37 stations. They can be seen below.
|
Station |
Multiplex |
Freq (MHz) |
Bit Rate Kb/s |
| Arrow |
MXR Nth West |
227.360 |
128 |
| Asian Sound |
CE Manchester |
220.350 |
128 |
| BBC Radio 1 |
BBC National DAB |
225.640 |
128 |
| BBC Radio 1 Xtra |
BBC National DAB |
225.640 |
128 |
| BBC Radio 2 |
BBC National DAB |
225.640 |
128 |
| BBC Radio 3 |
BBC National DAB |
225.640 |
160 |
| BBC Radio 4 |
BBC National DAB |
225.640 |
128 |
| BBC Radio 5 Live |
BBC National DAB |
225.640 |
80 |
| BBC Radio 5 Xtra |
BBC National DAB |
225.640 |
64 |
| BBC Radio 6 |
BBC National DAB |
225.640 |
128 |
| BBC Radio 7 |
BBC National DAB |
225.640 |
80 |
| BBC GMR |
BBC National DAB |
225.640 |
128 |
| BBC World Service |
BBC National DAB |
225.640 |
64 |
| BBC Asian |
BBC National DAB |
225.640 |
64 |
| Capital Disney |
MXR North West |
227.360 |
128 |
| Capital Gold |
CE Manchester |
220.350 |
128 |
| Century NW |
MXR North West |
227.360 |
128 |
| Choice |
MXR North West |
227.360 |
128 |
| Classic |
Digital 1 Network |
222.060 |
160 |
| Core |
Digital 1 Network |
222.060 |
128 |
| D1 Temp |
Digital 1 Network |
222.060 |
128 |
| Digital Network News |
MXR North West |
227.360 |
48 |
| Galaxy |
MXR North West |
227.360 |
128 |
| Heart |
MXR North West |
227.360 |
128 |
| Key 103 |
CE Manchester |
220.350 |
160 |
| Kiss |
CE Manchester |
220.350 |
128 |
| Life |
Digital 1 Network |
222.060 |
128 |
| Magic Manchester |
CE Manchester |
220.350 |
128 |
| Oneword |
Digital 1 Network |
222.060 |
64 |
| Planet Rock |
Digital 1 Network |
222.060 |
128 |
| Primetime |
Digital 1 Network |
222.060 |
128 |
| Real |
MXR North West |
227.360 |
128 |
| Smash Hits |
CE Manchester |
220.350 |
128 |
| Smooth |
MXR North West |
227.360 |
128 |
| Talksport |
Digital 1 Network |
222.060 |
64 |
| Virgin |
Digital 1 Network |
222.060 |
160 |
| XFM |
CE Manchester |
220.350 |
128 |
I eagerly started selecting them. The display gave a signal quality reading of between 95 and 100 depending on the station tuned in and all were perfectly resolved with no bubbling. I admit that my knowledge of the technical aspects of the transmission techniques of DAB is sadly lacking but I can judge the technical quality of the transmission with my ears, and the audio quality of those stations I could receive with the original antenna (those that weren’t bubbling) had dramatically improved. But referring back to the previous article on DAB in OHN, is the audio quality as good as or better/worse than a good FM signal? And how does it compare to a CD?
The defining factor in the quality of a DAB transmission is the "streaming bit rate". Apparently the data is sent in a stream of bits. The more bits sent in one second increases the audio quality. So a broadcaster has to estimate what an adequate bit rate is for the type of programme material he is transmitting. A speech only station only needs a low rate where a music station needs a much higher rate. For example BBC Radio 7 which broadcasts repeats of comedy programmes like The Goon Show, Round the Horne and the Navy Lark only needs a low bit rate to achieve an intelligible quality. But BBC Radio 3 broadcasts Classical music, where a much higher bit rate is necessary. The balance between quality and cost is very fine indeed. The higher the bit rate, the higher the cost and a reduction in the number of stations that can be transmitted from a multiplex.
By tuning in the same station (BBC Radio 3) on DAB and FM and making a rapid switch from DAB to FM the FM station was slightly better. It seemed to be crisper. Doing the same test with Classic FM there was a slightly more noticeable improvement on FM. Although it may not be a fair test using Classic FM because they seem to use massive audio compression so that all the quiet passages of music appear from your receiver at the same volume as the loud bits. This makes it very easy to listen to their broadcasts in a noisy environment such as a car or a kitchen. BBC Radio 3 uses less compression of their audio and even then only for drive time programming. One very noticeable difference though is stereo separation. This is much better on DAB than FM.
And what about a CD? No comparison. The CD wins hands down.
Where DAB really wins is with BBC 5 Live. The audio quality here is massively better than the MW broadcasts. Another huge advantage is the extremely efficient use of the frequency spectrum. The table clearly shows the number of stations transmitting on the same frequency.
One extra feature that DAB offers is a scrolling information display of the track that is playing and the next track to be featured. But BBC GMR uses this facility to give weather forecasts, traffic information and news headlines.
There are many stations appearing now on DAB that are exclusive to the medium. Sadly, the majority of broadcasters seem to think that the listening public only wants to hear Pop and Rock Music. When you have heard one, you’ve heard the lot, because they all sound the same. Standing out from the crowd are BBC R3, Classic FM, BBC R5, DNN, BBC R7, Oneword, Talksport, and Primetime which are unique in doing something else.
Interestingly BBC World, Virgin and Talksport that are free and receivable on both DAB and MW have to be paid for from WorldSpace. Work that one out.
If you have Freeview or Digital Satellite receivers many of the stations listed in the table can be heard via that medium.
By Geoff Oliver G0BJR
TDOTA 2005
Up until late January we thought that we would not be taking part in Thinking Day on the Air this year. During December 2004 a message had been received from Margaret Kenworthy, District Commissioner for the Royton Guides and Brownies, to the effect that because of the number of girls that had attended the event in 2004 and gained their Radio Communications Badges, there were not enough new girls to make the event viable in 2005.
However, the Guide group from St. Anne’s Church in Lydgate who had never attended a TDOTA event heard that we were not putting on the event for Royton Guides requested that we put on the event for them and other Saddleworth Guides and Brownies. We agreed and after receiving the licence and callsign GB2OSA (Oldham St. Anne’s) arrived at St. Anne’s Parish Church hall on the morning of the 20th February to set up and take part in the event once again.
The day began at 07:30 when I began loading the car with all the equipment necessary to put on the event. On arrival at 10:05 and looking around the grounds it soon became apparent that this was going to be a challenge and not an easy thing. The front of the building was on a main road and the south side of the building had a public footpath running along the side with houses next to that. At the rear of the building was a playground and was lovely apart from the fact that it had a tarmac surface. Beyond the playground lay what can only be described as a builders yard as the pub next door was having an extension built onto it. This put the option of putting an antenna in the pubs grounds out of the question. The north side of the building was also a small tarmac playground. To make things more complicated all around the building at about 12 ft above the ground were power cables or telephone cables.
After going inside and asking where we were to set up the station it seemed that they were asking the impossible. The stage is where they wanted us to go. If this option had been taken there would have been no windows to put the coax through and a feeder run of nearly 50 metres for both HF and VHF would have been necessary. HF could have been operated with this kind of length but most certainly VHF would have been dead. I quickly told them that in order for us to operate we must have a window access in order to get the coax into the building in as short as run as possible.
The main hall was being used until 13:30 by the church tea group. This meant that a side room had to be cleared to make room for an HF shack and the small hall would be used for VHF. The inside was decided and that was that. Outside still had its own headaches, lots of cables already in the sky. With a half size G5 it would not have been a problem. But this was not an option; we wanted a full size positioned as high as possible. The only place for this was along the side of the building where the footpath was. At the top end there was a telegraph pole that most of the cables ran from. A rope was placed around one of the top foot pegs and the G5 attached. Running it down the side of the building it was clear that we would only just make it to the front. We erected a 30 foot mast at the front with the colinear atop it. The G5 was placed over the top of the mast using a pulley to allow us to tension it. Luckily my car was parked at the front and this allowed us to tie the tensioning rope to the roof rack. This stopped the mast from bending because with the playground being tarmaced there was nowhere to put any anchor points for the guy ropes. This was a problem around the whole building.
While we had been putting up the antenna system others were inside setting up the Yaesu FT990 and FT847 transceivers. All that remained was to connect them together and see if they worked. On test both stations worked well and there was time to spare. It was 11:15 and as we were scheduled to start operating at 12:00 the guide leaders set out the refreshments, sandwiches, cake and fruit, and lots of tea and coffee which was enjoyed by all members. It was nice to relax and prepare for the arrival of the girls.
The first girls arrived and the serious stuff began. Being at 1000ft ASL
makes a big difference. HF was busy and it was difficult to find a clear
frequency. This was a nice change from not having enough stations to work.
Club members took turns in operating the stations and putting girls on the air
but the bulk of the operating tasks were borne by Alan Burgess G4GLV with Sue
Burgess G0RKE on HF and Elizabeth Crossley M0LIS with Mike Crossley M1CVL on
VHF. Of
the stations worked an interesting one was a TDOTA station located near
Rotterdam, Holland with the callsign PH2TD who had lots of girls attending all
of whom spoke remarkably good English and was happy to work lots of GB
stations. Other TDOTA stations worked included stations in Montrose, Wales,
Lincoln and Astley.
VHF went quiet in the mid afternoon and unfortunately one or two members had to resort to working their handhelds from outside which was a job and a half because of the bitter wind. Thankfully the snow had not arrived as was predicted by the weathermen.
Unfortunately the turn out of Guides was disappointing. Although the majority of the St. Anne’s Guides attended the other groups had declined at the last minute. This meant that the 25 girls who did attend could have several turns on the mike and they took full advantage of the opportunity. It also meant that the event finished earlier than planned. The station was dismantled at 14:30 and by 15:00 everyone was on their way home.
We would like to thank the Guide Leader Sue Lumley and her colleagues for their hospitality in providing us with the opportunity to take part in the event once again, and for the copious refreshments they provided for us.
Many thanks also for the help and expertise of the following members,
|
Geoff Ashton M0AUG |
Mike Crossley M1CVL |
|
Elizabeth Crossley M0LIS |
Chris Cunliffe G7OOD |
|
Alan Burgess G4GLV |
Sue Burgess G0RKE |
|
Geoff Oliver G0BJR |
Peter Rushton G7PMZ |
|
Ian Firby G7VCG |
Keith Graham M0KGM |
|
Ian Moth M0IJM |
Chris Mackay 2E1MDC |
|
Bertie Whitcher G7JUL |
Photographs by Geoff Oliver G0BJR and Chris Mackay 2E1MDC
By Chris Cunliffe G7OOD
SSETI EXPRESS Update – March 2005
By Graham Shirville G3VZV
Background
SSETI Express is the first of a series of satellites being developed by the Education Office of ESA – The European Space Agency as part of the "Student Space Exploration & Technology Initiative"
The satellite is quite large – 600x600x700mm and will weigh in at more than 50kg.
It is being built by university students from a number of teams from all across Europe and being assembled at the ESA ESTEC facility in the Netherlands.
The satellite is set for launch on a Cosmos rocket later this year with a number of other satellites into a sun synchronous 98o 680km orbit from Plesetsk in Russia.
The Payloads
There is an OBC, an attitude control system, a colour camera and cold gas thrusters on board as well as three cubesats which Express will "launch" soon after it separates from the launcher itself. All of these systems need to communicate with the ground both for tele-command uplink and for telemetry downlink purposes.
The Communications Suite
The main data transceiver is a UHF unit built by Holger Eckardt DF2FQ. It is based on his existing TF7 packet transceiver but the unit includes a 9k6 TNC and has its own switch mode power supply.
Originally this was going to be the only communications device being flown but there is also a set of experiment S band patch antennas being flown and they needed a transmitter to power them. To start with this was also going be a full data transceiver but the costs for a commercial unit made this option "non viable".
This gave AMSAT-UK the opportunity to offer a 3 watt S band transmitter free of charge to the project - on the basis that it could be linked to the UHF receiver for operation as a single channel FM voice transponder when all the experiments have been completed. The unit also incorporates its own switch mode power supply and a 38k4 TNC to allow the rapid downlinking of data – especially necessary for the camera experiment.
The S band transmitter progress
The transmitter unit is built into a beautifully machined and finished aluminium box provided by the University of Wroclaw who have also developed the three way power splitter and the experimental patch antennas.
Except for the TNC, which is a commercial TNC 7, the whole unit has been designed and built from scratch by the team. There are five boards. The exciter from Sam G4DDK, the PSU from David G0MRF, the command & control board and the sensor board from Jason G7OCD and the 3W PA from Charlie G3WDG (an identical unit to that flying in AO51).
The unit was first "delivered" to ESTEC early in November 2004 but further work on the wiring was needed and it was then returned to them again at the end of the month. At this stage the first actual amateur call was put through the satellite in the clean-room from the "control room" next door.
"The Ground Station"
The unit then remained at ESTEC and was regularly exercised to download data via the temporary ground station that had been provided to them by Howard G6LVB.
During February it became clear that the data rate from the OBC to the TNC needed to be changed to accommodate other mission requirements. An AMSAT team went over to rewire and reconfigure the unit and success was quickly achieved.
We then went on to apply the conformal coating to all the PCBs (except around the RF parts). At this stage disaster struck as the somehow some of the coating found its way right inside one of the filter assemblies – result no RF output! The unit was then brought back to the UK for "repair" but quickly returned again during the first week of March by Sam and David.
They were able to demonstrate the unit working again and also helped the SSETI team solve a power limiting problem which caused the unit to be switched off for 150ms every time it was commanded on – not helpful when trying to transmit short packets.
Here is an extract from part of the SSETI Express Integration logbook for 2nd March 2005:
The initial power consumption of S-Band FM seems good
The carrier is brought up successfully with the usual command
The DTMF telemetry is turned on and received without issue
The unit is switched to data config and data is transmitted without issue
The carrier is brought back down
The DTMF telemetry is turned on and received without issue
The unit is switched to data config and data is transmitted without issue
Transponding is tested without issue
MILESTONE 25: The S-Band sub-system is declared flight-ready.
Actually the S band transmitter is the FIRST sub-system to be declared flight-ready!
It has been a great experience for the AMSAT-UK team to be working with both the ESA experts and also the enthusiastic students – a number of whom have expressed the intention to get an amateur licence for themselves! It is a steep learning curve for them and for us - although we have been flattered in one presentation recently given by Neil Melville – the Project manager, which includes the text "Radio amateurs know what they are talking about"
What happens next?
A total of 150 solar cells, in ten strings of 15, are currently being laid onto the external panels of the satellite and we anticipate that these should be sufficient to enable the U/S transponder to work with the carrier up on a near 24/7 basis.
The flight model of the satellite will be completed over the next few weeks and will be subjected to the usual vibration tests and also thermal vacuum tests. Hopefully these tests will be completed without incident or problem.
The launch date is still not confirmed but should be late this summer.
The SSETI team will be providing full telemetry decoding information and will be encouraging us to provide downlinked telemetry data for them from around the world. They only have two ground stations of their own available and the software does not provide the "whole orbit data" that we are used to. Our worldwide network is certainly a unique facility and this data collection exercise will be good PR for the amateur satellite movement. ESA will be providing a prize for the amateur who provides them with the most. Full details will be available on the sseti website well before launch.
It is expected that the on board experiments should be completed within a matter of a couple of months from launch and after that the transponder can be placed into service. There is still a long way to go before that happy state becomes a reality and we have to remember that this is a high risk project – but if we don’t try………
References:
Full information about the project is available at the regularly updated www.sseti.net website. This includes the complete integration logbook mentioned above. It is a big file but makes very good reading for satellite enthusiasts!
The webcam: http://sseti.gte.tuwien.ac.at/WSW4/express4.htm
Downloads: http://sseti.gte.tuwien.ac.at/WSW4/express_downloads.htm
Space Colloquium
Members of the AMSAT-UK team who produced the S Band transmitter will be giving a presentation on SSETI Express at the AMSAT-UK Space Colloquium. This will be held at the University of Surrey in Guildford from 29 – 31st July. All Amateurs and SWL’s are welcome to attend the event.
For further details contact the secretary Jim Heck
G3WGM
Tel: 01258 453959
Email: g3wgm@amsat.org
Website: http://www.uk.amsat.org/
Submitted by Trevor Hawkins M5AKA
OLD HAMS NEWS
The editor would like to thank all contributors to this edition of Old Hams News. The next edition is due to be issued in July 2005. Any contributions for this edition should be forwarded to the editor, Geoff Oliver G0BJR on or before Thursday 16th June 2005 to ensure inclusion.
Articles will be accepted on many formats, by email to "news@oarc.org.uk", by word of mouth, hand or type written notes, or as a .txt file on a CD ROM or 3˝-inch floppy disc. Photographs, drawings, circuit diagrams and other graphics to enhance your article will also be most welcome.
If you submit an article for inclusion in Old Hams News and you do not wish it to be included in the Internet edition you must state your wishes at the time of submission. Otherwise the editor reserves the right to include/exclude your article as he sees fit.
For reference the officers and committee members are listed below and will be happy to help with any enquiries you may have.
Chairman – Geoff Oliver G0BJR
chairman@oarc.org.uk
Secretary – Mike Crossley M1CVL
Treasurer – Geoff Ashton M0AUG
secretary@oarc.org.uk
treasurer@oarc.org.uk
Craig Taylor G7MCT Chris Cunliffe G7OOD
Stuart Wilson G7MFK Steve Crabtree M0CRZ Sue
Burgess G0RKE
N.B. Old Hams News is the official journal of the Oldham Amateur Radio Club. It is distributed free of charge to all fully paid up members of the club. Articles appearing herein do not necessarily reflect the views of the editor, the Officers and Committee, or the membership of Oldham Amateur Radio Club. Whilst every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of articles included, the editor is not responsible for any inaccuracy that may occur.
Written, edited and produced by Geoff Oliver G0BJR
© Oldham Amateur Radio Club 2005